Genomics lab illegally markets genetic tests that claim to predict patient responses to drugs

Last Updated on

April 07, 2019 – Consumers are increasingly embracing genetic testing to better understand their individual risk for developing diseases. With this rise in popularity and availability, we’re also seeing significant activity in the field of pharmacogenetics, which is the process of understanding what, if any, role genetics plays in a patient’s reaction to particular drugs, therapies, or conditions.

Any number of tests on tablets and smartphones, some serious, some doubtable .

Lately, in the US, Inova Genomics Laboratory (Inova) of Falls Church, Virginia had marketed genetic tests with the self-exploratory and creative names of the MediMap ADHD, the MediMap Mind, the MediMap Plus, the MediMap Heart, and the MediMap BabyToday.  These tests had not been reviewed by the American Food & Drug Administration (FDA) for safety and effectiveness.

As a consequence, the FDA just issued a warning letter to Inova for illegally marketing these tests. The tests claim to predict patients’ responses to specific medications based on genetic variants. However, the FDA was unaware of any data that would reliably show that Inova’s tests in fact can help patients or health care providers make appropriate prospective treatment decisions involving the listed drugs or intended indications.

Selecting or changing drug treatment in response to the test results could lead to potentially serious health consequences for patients. The just issued warning letter by the FDA to Inova reflects the agency’s commitment to monitor the pharmacogenetic test landscape and take action when appropriate to address a significant public health risk.

Without appropriate evaluation ans supporting study data to determine whether genetic tests work, patients are being put at risk, potentially impacting treatment decisions by providing false promise that they will respond well to a certain medicine or keeping them from using therapies that otherwise may benefit them. There exists particular concern about pharmacogenetic tests that claim to predict patients’ responses to specific medications where such claims have not been established, are not described in the drug labeling, and/or do not mandatorily recommend that patients (or consumers for that matter) do consult with there treating physicians and genetic counsellors before taking decisions on treatments or life style based on genetic test results only.

This is the real danger of the current frenzy on direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) or direct to consumer theragenomic testing (DTCTT) for consumers, patients, and health care providers alike. To be able to detect genetic variants and use them in determining an appropriate course of care is one way in which  genetic research and innovation progresses. However, there remains so much more to learn about the use of emerging genetic tests that come out of this research for specific medications, what the results mean, and how the information can applied to improve a patient’s health.

The action taken bs the FDA in this particular case, including the warning letter issued to Inova, reflect and address the FDA’s commitment to advance policies that enhance the FDA’s oversight of device safety. As part of the Medical Device Safety Action Plan, the FDA has warned the public when safety issues are identified, such as with thermography devices. Also, last year, the FDA issued a safety communication warning consumers and health care professionals about pharmacogenetic tests being marketed directly to consumers or offered through health care providers that claim to predict how a patient will respond to specific medications. Following the issuance of this latter safety communication, the FDA reached out to several firms marketing pharmacogenetic tests with claims to predict how a person will respond to specific medications in cases where the relationship between genetic (DNA) variations and the medication’s effects has not been established. Most firms addressed the FDA’s concerns by removing specific medication names from their labeling, including promotional material and patient test reports.

Just as in the case of adverse effects of drugs, health care professionals and consumers should report any adverse events related to these and other genetic tests to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program. To file a report, use the MedWatch Online Voluntary Reporting Form. The completed form can be submitted online or via fax to 1-800-FDA-0178. The FDA monitors these reports and takes appropriate action necessary to ensure the safety of medical products in the marketplace.

See here a short sequence on DTCGT:

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
About the Author
Joseph Gut - thasso Ph.D.; Professor in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Senior expert in theragenomic and personalized medicine and individualized drug safety. Senior expert in pharmaco- and toxicogenetics. Senior expert in human safety of drugs, chemicals, environmental pollutants, and dietary ingredients.

Your opinion

Comment

No comments yet

thasso: conditions

thasso: newest tweets

thasso: recent comments

thasso post: magazine

View my Flipboard Magazine.

thasso: categories

thasso: archives

thasso: simple chat

You must be a registered user to participate in this chat.

  • Targeted therapy pralsetinib achieves high response rates in advanced cancers with RET gene fusions May 29, 2020
    The targeted therapy pralsetinib appears to have high response rates and durable activity in patients with a broad variety of tumors harboring RET gene fusions, according to results from the international Phase I/II ARROW trial, led by researchers at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
  • Genetic data may up diagnostic efficiency for rheumatic disease May 29, 2020
    (HealthDay)—Converting genotype information into an interpretable probability value for five different inflammatory arthritis-causing diseases could potentially improve the diagnostic efficiency of rheumatic disease, according to a study published in the May 27 issue of Science Translational Medicine.
  • New streamlined assay can improve prenatal detection of alpha-thalassemia May 29, 2020
    In a report in The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, researchers describe a rapid, accurate novel assay for nondeletional alpha-thalassemia genotyping based on one-step nested asymmetric PCR melting curve analysis, which may enhance prenatal diagnosis, newborn screening, and large-scale population screening.
  • Researchers identify mechanisms that make skin a protective barrier May 28, 2020
    A Mount Sinai research team has identified one of the mechanisms that establish the skin as a protective barrier, a breakthrough that is critical to understanding and treating common skin conditions including eczema and psoriasis, according to a study published Thursday, May 28, in the scientific journal Genes & Development.
  • Using electrical stimulus to regulate genes May 28, 2020
    This is how it works. A device containing insulin-producing cells and an electronic control unit is implanted in the body of a diabetic. As soon as the patient eats something and their blood sugar rises, they can use an app on their smartphone to trigger an electrical signal, or they can preconfigure the app do […]
Top