After an over the counter genetic test: Would you make serious health decisions?

Last Updated on

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests are advertised as a way to “find out what your DNA says”. Some promise insights into ancestry or disease risks, while others claim to provide information on personality, athletic ability, and child talent. People might be drawn to DTC genetic testing in the hope that it will provide clear cut information about their future health. But interpretation of genetic data is complex and context dependent and DTC genetic tests might report false positive and false negative results. A false positive result indicates that a person has a high genetic risk of a disease or condition when they actually don’t, while a false negative result indicates a person has a low genetic risk of a disease or condition when the person actually does have it.

These uncertainties may arise based on several aspects. A genetic test per se may simply deliver a wrong result for a given gene or a given locus within the genome. First, genetic tests from different sources are rarely compared (cross-validated) at a selection of gene loci for reproducible deliverance of identical test results. Second, the genotype of an individual does not all the time translate into the expected clinical phenotype of the patient. There may exist variations at the level of the molecular phenotype, there may exist an array of confounding factors, the patients may be a compound heterozygote, or the two alleles at the patients genetic locus may undergo transcriptional bursting, just  to name a few. Lastly, while upon epidemiological analysis a correlation between a certain gene and the occurrence of a disease or the risk for a disease might exist in large patients populations, the same may not apply to every single patient individually.

Thus, the genome and its working are immensely complex. No wonder then that experts in the field of (pharma)genomics are warning that results found via third party interpretation services need particular care. This is because the “raw data” that such services interpret will contain errors, and because the databases used to interpret the data may not be up to date. When people receive a “bad news” result from a direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic test, many may turn to their general practitioner (GP) for advice. However, most worrying in this context is an apparent significant gap in genomic literacy among medical doctors and other health care professionals. Indeed, only 1 in 10 physicians responding to a USA-based survey of 10’000 physicians reported feeling confident in their knowledge of (pharmaco)genomics and its clinical implications; less than 1 in 3 physicians had ever ordered a pharmacogenetic test, and only 1 in 8 physicians had recommended or ordered a test in the previous six months. This may even be more of a problem with direct to consumer (DTC) test concerned with personal or  suggestive of a genetic condition, or test results concerning future health risks such as positive BRCA tests and the prospective risk of developing breast cancer.

In any case, receiving direct to consumer (DTC) genetic test results with seemingly positive or negative test result at a certain genetic locus of interest, which would led a patient, or even a healthy individual, to take action, should led healthy individuals, patients, and treating physicians to have i) the test results confirmed by a second, cross validated test in order to exclude experimental errors, and ii) have an true expert in (pharmaco)genetics and/or genetic counselling looking over and analysing the test results in order to circumvent inappropriate measures to be taken. The example of the American lady cited above should be enough of a warning for everyone involved. According experts are easily reachable both in the US and in Canada.

See here a short sequence on the problem we talk about here:

Print Friendly, PDF & Email



Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
About the Author
Joseph Gut - thasso Ph.D.; Professor in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Senior expert in theragenomic and personalized medicine and individualized drug safety. Senior expert in pharmaco- and toxicogenetics. Senior expert in human safety of drugs, chemicals, environmental pollutants, and dietary ingredients.

Your opinion


No comments yet

thasso: conditions

thasso: newest tweets

thasso: recent comments

View my Flipboard Magazine.

thasso: categories

thasso: archives

thasso: simple chat

You must be a registered user to participate in this chat.

  • Metabolomics meets genomics to improve patient diagnosis July 7, 2020
    A patient and family walk into a doctor's office. They hope that the latest tests will reveal what is causing the patient's illness and end the diagnostic odyssey they have been going through for years. Having an accurate diagnosis also means that maybe there is a treatment that at least can alleviate the patient's condition.
  • Researchers develop new approach to study the genetics of human disease July 7, 2020
    Many heritable immune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and blood-cell related traits derive from critical proteins not being made or not functioning correctly. But exactly how a person's genes, the regulation of these genes and how the resulting proteins interact to cause disease is not widely understood.
  • Common inherited genetic variant identified as frequent cause of deafness in adults July 6, 2020
    A common inherited genetic variant is a frequent cause of deafness in adults, meaning that many thousands of people are potentially at risk, reveals research published online in the Journal of Medical Genetics.
  • Rsearchers create an analytic tool that opens a new frontier of cancer discovery July 6, 2020
    Gene coding regions constitute 2% of the human genome. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital scientists have developed a computational tool to identify alterations that drive tumor formation in the remaining 98% of the genome. The method will aid discovery of oncogenes and advances in precision medicine for children and adults with cancer.
  • Discovery of new disease-susceptibility gene for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome July 3, 2020
    An international research collaboration, including Professor Iijima Kazumoto et al. (of the Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine) has revealed that NPHS1 is a disease-susceptibility gene for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children. The NPHS1 gene encodes nephrin, a component protein for the renal glomerulus slit diaphragm, which prevents protein from being passed […]
  • Hearing and visual impairments linked to elevated dementia risk July 8, 2020
    Older adults with both hearing and visual impairments--or dual sensory impairment--had a significantly higher risk for dementia in a recent study published in Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring.
  • Certain jobs linked to higher risk of knee osteoarthritis July 8, 2020
    Workers in jobs that typically involve heavy lifting, frequent climbing, prolonged kneeling, squatting, and standing face an increased risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. That's the conclusion of a new analysis published in Arthritis Care & Research.
  • Bacteria in infants' first stool may indicate their risk of obesity July 8, 2020
    Meconium--the earliest stool of an infant -- is composed of materials ingested during the time the infant spends in the uterus. A new study published in Pediatric Obesity found that the types of normal bacteria found in the meconium may predict an infant's likelihood of later developing obesity.
  • New trial results question standard treatment plan for rheumatoid arthritis July 8, 2020
    In a clinical trial of patients with rheumatoid arthritis, treatment with a drug called upadacitinib provided greater benefits than methotrexate, the most commonly used initial therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Early clinical trial tests treatment strategy for pancreatic cancer July 8, 2020
    Pancreatic cancer carries a poor prognosis, and it often goes undetected until advanced stages. A new BJS (British Journal of Surgery) study indicates that a certain cocktail of chemotherapy drugs may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with a metastatic form of the disease.